Garbage Theology
Findings of
a Garbologist/Theologian/Environmentalist
by John
E. (Jack) Swanson
Archaeology
has been a boon to the understanding of the Bible by giving insights into
the language and culture during the time of the writing of scripture. A science
that has emerged today using basic archaeological principles is called "garbology."
It is the study of the language, culture and behavior of the contemporary
world by sifting through and analyzing smelly, pasty, moldy, wet trash.
Garbologists
have an advantage over the archaeologists. They can interview the human trash
producers. It is here that the study of garbage makes its best contribution
regarding human behavior. The garbage makes its best contribution regarding
human behavior The garbologists' most significant find is that what their
research in the landfills reveals is not congruent with what people say they
are doing.1
It is the
intention of this essay to dig into our garbage to learn what it tells us
about our attitudes toward natural resources and how it reflects what we believe
about ourselves and about God. It will also suggest a revision of our understanding
and treatment of garbage based on an understanding of the Christian faith.
Garbage
is something everyone produces. It is estimated that in the Untied States
each person produces 3.5 pounds per day. It is a viable source of information
regarding human behavior. In the garbage can or landfill we see evidence of
our insatiable desire for convenience, our indifference to the other (both
human and non-human) and personal laziness. Values that have been shaped by
and emerged from such behavior have led to the disregard for and disruption
of the balance of the natural world, glorified the use rather than the love
of the natural world, and ignored the necessity of biodiversity
In a landfill
we find these items:
Paper
Yard/Garden Waste
Metal
Rubber, Leather,
Other
Food Waste
Glass
Plastic
Other
|
41%
18%
9%
8%
8%
8%
7%
1% 2 |
What might
the excavations of a landfill tell us about our attitudes toward the environment?
-
We live
with abundance. We take more than we need. We have more than we need. We
confuse our wants and our needs. We have a compulsion to consume.3
Landfills show that when there is not a shortage of a commodity there is
more waste, and that the greater the variety in a diet, the more the spoilage.4
- We impact our natural
world with poisons to create a "perfect" piece of fruit and throw
the produce in the dumpster behind the market place when it "spoils."
We will pay the price for unblemished produce.
- We are heavily dependent
upon technology. As magnificent as this is, Thomas Berry warns: "The
immediate danger is not possible nuclear war, but actual industrial plundering."5
- We are reluctant to
acknowledge limits upon our system, and we wear blinders to the population
explosion. This becomes apparent when we begin to run out of space to put
garbage.
- Advertising and packaging
contribute to products in the landfill. They indicate our obsession with health,
sanitation and the safety of products. Tamper-proofing, quality and cleanliness
are all "good" reasons for packaging.
- A corollary to the above
is what advertising and packaging tell us about the competition in the market
place, the lack of trust in the human community and the absence of personal
discipline with regard to the way things that belong to others are handled.
-
|
Garbage
is where human history and natural history converge. |
Communication in the written
form has taken over. Over 40% of the landfill is paper. Ironically, even the
environmental groups produce volumes of printed matter to campaign "against
the use of certain highly visible and famously odious forms of garbage."6
- Products have short-term
use. How often does a polystyrene cup get used before it is pitched?
- A manicured environment
is important to many people. Grass clippings and dead leaves in plastic bags
fill landfills. For the sake of appearance we deny one type of natural cycle
and create a problem where recycling is virtually impossible. Measurements
are being taken to minimize this problem.
- It appears that science
exists for the benefit of technology, the welfare of the human species' medical
needs and the fulfillment of the "good life." It is just within
recent history that science is being directed toward the care of the earth.
The
unholy trinity that leads to environmental destruction: indifference, laziness,
and convenience born of abundance. |
|
Here is a "theology"
that emerges from the garbage dump.
- God is the "good
life" in whatever way that is derived for each individual. In this paradigm
God is providential. Faith is grounded in the "goodness" of God.
The "good life" might be defined as that which is healthy, sanitary,
convenient, safe and cooperative. "Good" is an extrinsic, not an
intrinsic value.
- Human beings believe
in their ability to manipulate the earth. There is sufficiency of resource
an the technological skills to adapt the resources. Good stewardship of the
earth is expeditiously and rapidly moving natural resources to the trash heap.
- Evil is more powerful
than goodness and is perceived as succeeding. There is fear of destruction,
invasion of privacy and contamination. Thus, people strive to rid themselves
of what is wicked to them as efficiently as possible.
- Time and space are for
one's use. Each person decides one's values for oneself. A common criterion
is that time is finite (the end will be soon), and space is infinite (there
is more than enough, and it will take care of itself).
- Hope is grounded in
an earth that can supply and technical skills that can discover and invent.
Comfort and convenience are words used in place of "salvation."
When the word "salvation" is used, it refers to something beyond
this life.
- The sacred is that which
is unblemished and manicured. The profane is the unkempt which must be pushed
aside. (This is what the garbage person collects.) A sacred space is a setting
which is garbage free for communion with God.
- The creative and redemptive
processes are for the benefit of humans to compensate for the sinfulness of
the human species. Sin is inadequacy rather than rebellion against God an
God's creation.
- Stewardship is measured
and motivated by the Gross National Product.
- God's creation is to
be consumed.
- The use and value of
non-human entities are determined by the use rather than the used.
Theology can be defined
as a dialogue engaging the concrete world and the teachings of the faith. One
could call theology the intersecting of the divine, the human and the non-human.
From a Christian theological point of view, what alternate understanding of
the garbage dump can be perceived?
- What God creates is
good. (Note Genesis 1 and 1 Timothy 4:4.) In the natural order, that which
is discarded by one organism is useful for another organism. Garbage must
be seen as a part of the "goodness" of God's world. Convenience
as the "good" must be challenged.
- There are no sinless
alternatives. Humans do not have ultimate knowledge of the consequences of
any deed. TO think they can dispose of garbage and forever never need be concerned
with its nonsense. Humans are committed to managing garbage, both what we
create and what others create.
- Jesus Christ is the
reconciler of the world ,restoring relationships. This is the intention of
God. Garbage must e treated within God's reconciliation plan. It is done by
recycling (returning to the natural cycles what we have used) and re-streaming
(making second and third uses of the items humans produce that cannot be returned
to the natural cycle). Humans cannot be indifferent to anything they produce.
- What does it mean to
love one's neighbor? It means to reduce the amount of garbage that is created
and to consider others when seeking solutions to the disposal of garbage.
For this, an attitudinal change is needed. Humans have treated garbage and
where it is disposed of as the despised, the unwanted. Humans must learn to
live in community with all of creation. This requires effort, not ease.
|
Three sins inherent
in technology which our society must recognize and combat: mastery, myopicism,
and messianism. Mastery is the idea that humans can "control"
the natural world. Myopia is disregarding an inclusive and catholic worldview.
Messianism is the notion that technology can "save" the world.
The church teaches
a sacrificial style of life to people who practice a lifestyle of consumerism.
This is both a crisis of faith and a challenge for conversion.
|
A look at a garbage dump
or even a garbage can brings to mind three Bible stories.
The first is the story
of the rich man (Matthew 19:16-26) who asked Jesus what he should do to attain
eternal life. Jesus instructed him to give up his possessions. However, he went
away grieving because he had great abundance. TO obey Jesus would mean to do
without his conveniences.
The second is the story
of the Rich Man and Lazarus (Luke 16:19-31). This text is a reminder of people
in Third World countries scavenging the garbage dumps for food with dogs at
their heels. The chasm between the two men was not poverty and wealth but the
rich man's indifference.
The third is the parable
of the man who entrusts his property to three slaves before he goes on a journey
(Matthew 25:14-30). Two of the slaves put their talents to work while the third
slave buries his in the ground. When the master returns he commends the two
slaves and condemns the third for his laziness. The most repeated reason for
putting things into the garbage is because one does not want to make an effort
to do anything else.
What do people see when
they look in their garbage can? What does it reveal about what they really believe
about God, the care of the earth, and the values that are shaped by convenience,
indifference and laziness? It is time Christians make a greater effort to be
congruent about what they believe, say and do. They can start with the garbage.
John E. (Jack) Swanson, M.Div., is the Director of the Lutheran Outdoor Ministries
Center in Oregon, Illinois. He is the author of two books about the environment
and Christian life and faith: Birth
of the Earth - Natural Wild Free and What Did Noah Do About Trash?
End Notes
1.
William Rathje and Colleen Murphy, Rubbish! The Archaeology of Garbage (New
York: HarperCollins Publishers, 1992), 245.
2. Paul Connet, Waste Management: As if the Future Mattered
(St. Lawrence University, 1988), 3.
3. Thomas Berry, The Dream of the Earth (San Francisco:
Sierra Club Books, 188), 115.
4. Rathje and Murphy, op. cit., 62.
5. Berry, op. cit., 72.
6. Rathje and Murphy, op. cit., 106.
Back
to Table of Contents